Oklahoma bill#1003 to declare sovereignty passed out of committee unanimously!

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Carol Adams McLean on February 13, 2009 at 4:19pm

From WA
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-10/Pdf/Bills/House%2...

From NH
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

From Montana
http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm

From MI (resolution 4)
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21rmjiv1sl0wvw55yxurwl55))/documents/2009-2010/Journal/House/pdf/2009-HJ-01-22-002.pdf

From MO
http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM

From OK
http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/state-legislator-charles...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Tomasik on February 16, 2009 at 9:33am

Carol,

Please keep us up to date on this.

You can consider yourself FairTaxNation's Investigative Political Reporter... ;o)


Jim

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Hunt on February 13, 2009 at 9:15pm

It was reported on the Glenn Beck show 20 other states are considering the same type of bill.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tony on February 16, 2009 at 12:07pm

How many states does it take do you think for true action to be taken by the Fed?

I'm still learning the whole sovereignty deal here....I'm interested in this as I live in Oklahoma

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carol Adams McLean on February 16, 2009 at 12:27pm

A constitutional convention would be 3/4 of the states -38 states. If 38 states said they no longer wanted to be part of this union, the federal govt, if it follows the constitution has to dissolve. Our federal govt tends to ignore the constitution, so marshal law may be their chosen response. This is all revolutionary talk.

• ▶ Reply