I would appreciate comments on this: Any details of The FairTax should be discussed only after the absolute neccesity of reverting back to the Constitutional principle of indirect taxation is understood.
The reason I say this is because I have for 4 years been fielding comments at speeches and on blog posts about nit-picking details of The FairTax that folks (usually so-called Conservative Republicans) toss about with glee and abandon. There is no end to this nonesense, it seems.
BTW - NEVER say Flat Tax because most morons think it is really a Flat Tax. It is a Flat Income Tax and must be called such. I have never run into one of these nay-bob Republicans who seem to have the slightest idea what the Forbes-Armey Flat Income Tax actually is about. They instead make up some dream Flat Tax in their heads and spout that as if they knew what they were talking about.
I am convinced that the strategy of tauting the superiority of The FairTax has little chance of success, primarily because people have to be made to understand that reforming a direct tax (ie income tax) does NOTHING except build better arguments for perpetuating the primary evil; the direct taxation itself.
The strategy needs to become one of focusing on educating Americans about WHAT direct taxation is and WHY it needs to be removed completely. Then, since The FairTax is the ONLY viable indirect taxation system to replace it with we vastly increase our chances of success.
Please see my latest blog on this subject at the blog section of my website (
www.FairTaxWarrior.com) or the specific blog posting at (
http://fairtaxwarrior.blogspot.com/).
I am interested in your opinions. Thanks.
You need to be a member of Fair Tax Nation to add comments!
Join Fair Tax Nation