I understand the value of taxing consumption instead of production and belief it to be an admirable goal if not esential in the long term. The Fair Tax does that ! Which is very good.
Two points that I need to understand better are:
First: Don't we need to first pass a Constitutional Amendment against income tax before authorizing a national sales tax. History tells us that if we do not close the door Washington will utilize all revenue sources.
Second: Should we not leave in place the payroll deduction for Social Security retirement. I fully realize that SS is a ponzi scheme and the money that I put in was spent on my parents and that my children's money will support me. Having said that SS has been self sustaining and can be in the future and there does exist a rationale between how much each citizen puts in and the benefits they recieve. If we fund SS with a sales tax how will we even determine each individuals benefits? Won't SS become simply a welfare system with no fairness at all?
Comment
First Point: You make a very strong point that has been brought up before, but at least for me, I personally am willing to take the risk.
Second Point: Someone else will have to come in and answer the SS point better than I do, but I can quickly respond by stating that there is definitely a better way of determining individual benefits rather than the Payroll tax. Even if we just based it off of their income, there is no need to still jack a portion of your paycheck. I'm pretty sure the Fair Tax deals with this issue, but I unfortunately don't know the answer off the top of my head. Anyone else please help?
© 2025 Created by Marilyn Rickert.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Fair Tax Nation to add comments!
Join Fair Tax Nation