Replace All Federal Taxes on Income with the Fair Tax Act , HR 25 and S 122

cary henderson's Discussions (252)

View

Discussions Replied To (223)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Has there been any indication that there will indeed be a response?" cary henderson replied Feb 16 to We Made It!	2	Feb 16 Reply by Jim Bennett
"Guess who showed up in the replies? Good ole Hank! Worstall did reply to one of my r…" cary henderson replied Aug 31, 2012 to Action Needed: Respond to Worstall Article: "Why the FairTax Will Fail"	1	Aug 31, 2012 Reply by cary henderson
"Welcome Ollie, Good to have a new FairTaxer on board. We need support in NY and all…" cary henderson replied Apr 23, 2012 to Welcome Ollie Johnson, New FairTax State Director for New York State	2	Jan 3 Reply by J David Swift
"Jim, What do you have in mind? I,m with Robert on the Prevent 999 idea, but we also…" cary henderson replied Apr 6, 2012 to Boortz Supports Cain's 9-9-9	8	Apr 6, 2012 Reply by cary henderson
"One more gross abuse of our Constitution!" cary henderson replied Mar 5, 2012 to Here is a co-sponsor to the FairTax. Now why do we need the FairTax passed today!	3	Mar 7, 2012 Reply by Mark Schaff
"Almost 39% and still rising, vote now!" cary henderson replied Jan 31, 2012 to Call to Action: MSNBC Poll	4	Feb 21, 2012 Reply by Gracemarie Collins
"Becauase his tax lawyers and accountants wont tell him about it!" cary henderson replied Jan 5, 2012 to CNBC interviews Ingersoll Rand chairman/CEO, Herbert Henkel. Go to the six minute mark...	4	Jan 5, 2012 Reply by cary henderson
"I saw the last half, I'll have to watch the whole hearing. Your evaluation seems acc…" cary henderson replied Nov 19, 2011 to Tax reform hearing	4	Nov 19, 2011 Reply by Nori Lamphere
"My problem with 9-9-9 is that if Congress lets him have it they will not go on to th…" cary henderson replied Oct 15, 2011 to Sample fairTax (Cain's 999 plan) letter to the editor	6	Oct 17, 2011 Reply by Dan Hunt
"Agreed!" cary henderson replied Oct 15, 2011 to Herman Cain's 9-9-9 economic plan	22	Oct 19, 2011 Reply by Frank Gilbert