Fair Tax Leadership

Comment

Comment by Jim Tomasik on January 25, 2009 at 10:55am

Billie,

Have you offered?

Please hook up with your new SD and get involved. Make yourself a contact person for your town or area. You are concerned enough to join this leadership group so show it by becoming at least a low level leader in Ohio.

Jim

Jim

Comment by Billie on January 25, 2009 at 10:35am

I am a volunteer. I don't think I have a title. But that doesn't stop me.

Comment by Steve Curtis on January 25, 2009 at 9:42am

State Director, Ohio

Comment by Danny Higgins on January 25, 2009 at 8:22am

I am state Director for Indiana.

Comment by Jim Tomasik on January 24, 2009 at 8:19pm

I am ass't state directior for tn.

Comment by Dave Sibole on January 24, 2009 at 7:17pm

Someone has ask for us to identify our position of leadership. I'll start. I'm DD Oh 03

Comment by Jabari Zakiya on January 23, 2009 at 2:34pm

I had a 43 minute talk today (F 1/23/09 ~1pm) with the Tax LegAid for
new Rep Donna Edwards/MD4/Dem. He was stereotypically ideologicall
oppesed to it, and said Ms Edwards wouldn't probably be a co-sponsor
(what I asked she do).

He brought up the issues of compliance and the ability to raise revenue,
which I addressed in the email I include here below.

However, he did say if people in here district called to say they were
in favor of the FairTax, they would consider looking at it more.

So, I'm asking to get the word out to people in the MD-4 to call Ms Edwards office and tell Nathaniel Tipton they support the FairTax. He also said he didn't want to hear from people bashing the IRS. MD, which has 8 Reps, has Roscoe Bartlett currently as a co-sponsor. Even non-constituents calling will be beneficial, because this guy has no real clue (which we need to demonstrate to him) how much public support the FairTax has.

I also want to tell this group that from W-Th (Jan 21,22) I called all 42
members of the House Ways & Means Committee to ask them to become co-sponsors, or give me feedback on the bill. I mostly left messages. Two W&M members are currently co-sponsors.

Being in DC, I want to start gearing up to take teams of people up on the Hill and start talking to W&M members about the FairTax. All we need are 22 members to vote it out of committee and 218 (out of 435) to vote YES in the House to get it passed there. These are the working number: 22 and 218, and 51 for the Senate.

Jabari

-----------------------------------------------------
Hi Nathaniel,

Thanks for taking 43 minutes to engage me in a discussion of the FairTax today.

Here is the url from the www.fairtax.org website which answers questions on
revenue neutrality, compliance, et al questions about the FairTax you raised.

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_fairtax_four#enforceable

The website has a wealth of information on the FairTax in the form of FAQs,
direct comparisons to other tax proposals, videos, etc. You name it we got it!

I will send you info on polls, etc. to show you the American public consistently
prefers the FairTax over the "income tax" system when becoming informed of the
FairTax features and benefits. The FairTax consistently win in these polls.

See the public support of the FairTax here: http://whitehouse2.org/

I've also attached for your convenience a whitepaper I pullled off the FairTax
website specifically dealing with compliance issues, which I obtained from the
link to that section of the discussion below.

I would hope that you/Ms Edwards would not require that the FairTax be "perfect"
before you consider it. NO TAX SYSTEM IS PERFECT! The relevant question is is
the FairTax "better" than the present system, and easier to improve if necessary.

Please don't create artificial hoops the FairTax must jump through before you
consider supporting it, when it is absolutely clear how complex, dysfunctional,
and incomprehensible the current "income tax" system is, which you don't force
to jump through those same hoops, in rationalizing its continuance.

Can we at least agree that the "income tax" must be replaced, if not what should
replace it?

Again, thank you for your time, and I will keep in contact with you.

Peace

Jabari Zakiya
202-390-6398
American For Fair Taxation (AFFT)
www.fairtax.org


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT THE FAIRTAX

"The FairTax will not be enforceable and evasion will be rampant"

The truth: More than 80% of all tax returns are eliminated under the FairTax--every individual filing. What remains are retail outlets collecting the FairTax. Of these, 80 percent of all retail sales now occur at large retail chains like Wal-Mart. The point is oversight will still reside under the Treasury Department but the government's responsibility will be over a far smaller "universe" of tax collection points making compliance oversight far less costly and far more effective than the current system which costs $265 billion a year in compliance costs and still comes up $350 billion a year short of what is owed.

Read more information about compliance in the FairTax white paper: FairTax Reduces Complexity, Compliance Costs and Noncompliance.


"The FairTax will not be revenue neutral (i.e. bring in the same revenue as the current system) at 23%"

The truth: The FairTax rate of 23% (when calculated inclusively like income tax rates) has been thoroughly researched to provide all the revenues now collected under both the income tax system and through FICA payroll taxes. Reports otherwise are largely based on the President's Advisory Panel on Tax Reform which declared the rate would have to be much higher. What the Panel failed to make clear in an amazingly shameless sleight-of-hand is that they never studied the FairTax legislation as it exists in pending legislation. They ignored $22 million of FairTax research and, instead, quietly devised their own national consumption tax which they loaded with the exemptions and deductions they felt were "politically realistic". They also failed to calculate the effects of elimination of the FICA tax on annual taxpayer burdens or on the distributional effects of the FairTax across the income spectrum. Upon completion--and after declaring a national consumption tax flawed--they then refused to publish their underlying assumptions.

For more information on this topic, see these research papers.

* Taxing Sales Under the FairTax - What Rate Works?
* A Comparison of the FairTax Base and Rate
* Comparing Average and Marginal Tax Rates under the FairTax and the Current System of Federal Taxation


"The FairTax is not politically viable"

The truth: Great public policy changes do not happen easily. We believe, however, in the promise of the Founding Fathers that this is a nation, "of, by and for the people". In the last year we have seen more Congressional co-sponsors come on board faster than ever before. We have seen five of eight GOP candidates and one Democratic candidate embrace the FairTax. With increased media coverage, as at least one candidate has made this a central plank of his campaign, more and more Americans have come to understand the powerful benefits the FairTax offers the nation. They are, in turn, joining our growing citizen army and are beginning to communicate their wishes to their elected officials. All of this progress is a consequence of the body politic first learning about and then accepting the FairTax. As our ranks grow such pressure will increase on Members of Congress and at some point, the voice of the people will eclipse the voices of the relatively small number of Washingtonians who profit working the income tax system at great cost to the nation. Enactment of the FairTax will require an activist citizenry and a resurgence of what has been too often forgotten--public policy can and should be driven by the public. All that is required is that we all dare to be fair and remind our elected officials that they work for their constituents--not for the narrow self-interests of the tax writing committee, the lucrative tax lobby business or the academicians who have built careers around the complexity of the tax code.

For more information on this topic, see these research papers:

* Tax Administration and Collection Costs
* A Macroeconomic Analysis of the FairTax Proposal
* An Open Letter to the President, the Congress and the American People
* Fiscal Federalism - The National FairTax and the States


"The FairTax is regressive and shifts the tax burden onto lower and middle income people"

The truth: The FairTax actually eliminates and reimburses all federal taxes for those below the poverty line. This is accomplished through the universal prebate and by eliminating the highly regressive FICA payroll tax. Today, low and moderate income Americans pay far more in FICA taxes than income taxes. Those spending at twice the poverty level pay a FairTax of only 11.5 percent -- a rate much lower than the income and payroll tax burden they bear today. Meanwhile, the wealthy pay the 23 percent retail sales tax on their retail purchases.

Under the federal income tax, slow economic growth and recessions have a disproportionately adverse impact on lower-income families. Breadwinners in these families are more likely to lose their jobs, are less likely to have the resources to weather bad economic times, and are more in need of the initial employment opportunities that a dynamic, growing economy provides. Retaining the present tax system makes economic progress needlessly slow and frustrates attempts at upward mobility through hard work and savings, thus harming low-income taxpayers the most.

In contrast, the FairTax dramatically improves economic growth and wage rates for all, but especially for lower-income families and individuals. In addition to receiving the monthly FairTax prebate, these taxpayers are freed from regressive payroll taxes, the federal income tax, and the compliance burdens associated with each. They pay no more business taxes hidden in the price of goods and services, and used goods are tax free.

How can the FairTax generate lower net tax rates for everyone and still pay for the same real government expenditures? The answer is two-fold. Firstly, the tax base is dramatically widened by including consumer spending from the underground economy (estimated at $1.5 trillion annually), and by including illegal immigrants, those who escape their fair share today through loopholes and gimmicks. In addition, 40 million foreign tourists a year will become American taxpayers as consumers here. Secondly, not everyone's average net tax burden falls. For households whose major economic resource is accumulated wealth, the FairTax will deliver a net tax hike compared to the current system.

Consider, for example, your typical billionaire, of which America now has more than 400. These fortunate few are invested primarily in equities on which they pay taxes at a 15 percent rate, whether their income comes in the form of capital gains or dividends. In addition to having the income from their wealth taxed at a low rate, the principal of their wealth is completely untaxed either directly or indirectly. Assuming they and their heirs spend only the income earned on the wealth each year, the tax rate today is 15 percent. In contrast, under the FairTax, the effective tax rate is 23 percent. Hence, the very wealthy will pay more taxes when the FairTax is enacted. In a nutshell, those who spend more will pay more but low, moderate and middle income taxpayers will benefit from the greatest gains in reduced tax liabilities.

For more information on this topic, see Why the FairTax Will Work.

Comment by Jim Tomasik on January 21, 2009 at 2:36pm

Carol,
I'm working on gettin ghis schedule.

Michael,
Please list this on this and all other events on the calandar on the front page. We want visitors to see we have events going on all over the country and that FairTax is on the move nationwide. Every event counts.

Jim

Comment by Michael Patton on January 21, 2009 at 2:26pm

I have been given 15 minutes on the combined precinct meeting for my voting precinct (and surrounding precincts as well). I have also been granted permission to have a table set up to distribute FairTax materials.

The meeting will be held on february 19, and the location will be announced next week, but I imagine it will be somewhere near SouthWest Cary NC.

Please contact me if you would like to attend ot assist.

Michael Patton

Comment by Carol Adams McLean on January 21, 2009 at 11:59am

How can we get his schedule?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 34
• 35
• 36
• 37
• 38
• 39
• Next ›
• Page